Categories
African American Women at William & Mary Essays Uncategorized

The Untold Story of African American Women at William & Mary

Maggie Aschmeyer, Marc Charbonier, Laura Kirk, William Ryu

Branch Out Alternative Break 2020

 

The Untold Story of African American Women at William & Mary

Introduction

African American women have been essential to the establishment and development of William & Mary since its founding in 1693. However, early historical records critically lack information regarding the very existence of African American women at the university, making their early contributions greatly unknown and undervalued. African American women at William & Mary have contributed to the growth and success of the university as enslaved laborers, paid staff members, and eventually as students and faculty.

The Lemon Project: A Journey of Reconciliation at William & Mary has been working to rectify the wrongs perpetrated against African Americans by the university. Among other significant accomplishments, The Lemon Project has been uncovering the names of enslaved African Americans at William & Mary through analyzing local runaway slave advertisements and baptismal records from the Bruton Parish Episcopal Church in Williamsburg. As of January 2020, the names of approximately thirty female slaves owned by William & Mary have been uncovered, as well as those of approximately 160 female slaves owned by the faculty and students. The long history of African American women at William & Mary has remained largely excluded from the university’s academic discussions. The evidence describing the 327 years that African American women have been at William & Mary reveals a story of injustice and persistence in the face of adversity.

The Early Years: Slavery

The relationship between African American women and William & Mary begins with slavery. Enslaved African Americans built the Wren building, the Brafferton, and the President’s House, and were intensively involved in the daily operations and long-term growth of the university.1 In 1718, William & Mary acquired Nottoway Quarter, a tobacco plantation in present-day Virginia counties of Sussex, Surry, Prince George, and Dinwiddie. Seventeen enslaved laborers were purchased to operate the plantation, which funded the university’s operations and student scholarships.2 At William & Mary, enslaved female laborers likely cooked, cleaned, worked in the gardens, and performed other housekeeping duties.3 At times, the university sold or rented its slaves for revenue. For example, William & Mary sold eight slaves in 1782 to raise funds necessary for building renovations.Members of the William & Mary faculty and administration, particularly President Thomas Roderick Dew, strongly argued in support of slavery, chacterizing it as an “absolute and necessary good.”5 William & Mary staff members played a significant role in the justification and perpetuation of slavery in Virginia and the United States.

Post-Slavery Transition

Following the abolishment of slavery in 1865, the relationship between African American women and William & Mary transitioned from unpaid to paid labor. Information specifically regarding African American women at the university is scarce during both the slavery and post-slavery periods. Records pertaining to African Americans at William & Mary were poorly kept and academic information relating to women of color during this time period is not widely available. The history of African American labor at William & Mary in this post-slavery period regards both men and women.

According to The Lemon Project: A Journey of Reconciliation – Report of the First Eight Years, “blacks continued to serve in important roles at William & Mary, just as they had when they were enslaved. Free black labor during this period resembled the labor of the enslaved.”6 African Americans took on paid roles at the university as janitors, dining hall staff, and groundskeepers. From the beginning of their employment, African American wages remained too low to support themselves.During the Jim Crow era, the university hired African Americans particularly for jobs that required heavy labor, and wages were kept low.8 William & Mary also often used intimidation techniques to “remind” African American workers “of their place” in society.For example, in 1926, the Ku Klux Klan gifted William & Mary a flagpole, which was placed at the university bus stop. The university staff, many of whom were African American, were picked up and dropped off for work at that flagpole until its removal in 1959.10

In the late 1930s, William & Mary President John Stewart Bryan directly acknowledged the university’s underpayment of African American staff. Bryan stated that African Americans employed by the university had “for a long time… been greatly underpaid,” and he gave a greater pay raise to African American workers than to white workers.11 However, racial disparities have remained deeply ingrained at the university. Heightened racial awareness in the 1960s brought William & Mary’s unequal practices to light, and students and staff members protested the university’s low wages, its lack of career advancement opportunities, and its discriminatory working conditions for African Americans.12 One William & Mary Flat Hat article from the 1960s discussed the “deplorable employment situation” of African Americans at the university. This article highlighted the reality that African American staff members did not work at the university because they particularly “want to,” but because the positions they filled are “traditionally held” by African Americans.13 Despite their many contributions to the success and daily operations of William & Mary, African American staff members have remained disadvantaged and undervalued.

Integration Efforts

In Fall of 1967, African American women at William & Mary were finally admitted as students, marking a new era of contribution from female African Americans to the university. The first female African American undergraduate students to live on campus at William & Mary were Janet Brown Strafer, Karen Ely, and Lynn Briley. They arrived at the university in Fall 1967 and lived together in Jefferson Hall. In 2012, a plaque honoring the three women was placed outside of Jefferson Hall. Karen Ely shared her thoughts regarding the plaque in an interview for The Lemon Project, stating that the placement of the plaque is “fitting” given Jefferson’s history of owning slaves. Ely mentioned that the hall’s namesake, Thomas Jefferson, must be “turning over in his grave.”14

While the three women reflected on parts of their time at William & Mary as positive experiences, their integration into the student body included several negative experiences as well. Although Lynn Briley states that she “never felt any hostility” from the other girls in Jefferson Hall, Ely remembers finding a racial slur on the sidewalk outside of the dorm during freshman orientation.15 Ely also recalls feeling personally pressured to to forge a better path for any black students that attend William & Mary in the future. She told the Lemon Project, “I refused to quit because I felt if we quit, then other people wouldn’t want to come, so I said no, I’ve got to put up with whatever I had to put up with.”

In her 1970 essay “The Black Experience,” Strafer stated, “There are also a few with whom I have made what [I] hope to be lasting friendships. These few, however, cannot right the wrongs of the majority. Therefore it is impossible for me to change any of the views I hold about the white man until he changes his views about Black people. I mean honestly and not in the ways he has pretended to thus far.”16

On top of the challenges and discrminiation they experienced due to their race, Strafer, Ely, and Briley also had to abide by the stricter rules that were placed on all female students. These additional rules included a rigid dress code that prevented female students from wearing pants outside of their dorms unless they covered themselves with a coat. Strafer remembers that female students also had to flip a blue card outside of their door when exiting their dorm room so that the Resident Assistants could keep track of them.17 Furthermore, Ely shared with The Lemon Project that date rape prevalently occurred on campus during her years at the university but often “got pushed under the rug.”18 These issues exemplify the challenges that affected all women at William & Mary during this time, which also played a role in shaping the experiences of the first female African American students.

In 1968, five African American women were admitted to William & Mary. By the end of their first semester, three of those students had already dropped out. Edith Cooke was one of the two women who remained at the university. In 1969, Cooke told the Flat Hat, “Besides the luck involved in getting a particular professor, another reason given for the high percentage of failures was the pressure of adjusting socially while maintaining studies at the same time.” Cooke recounted at least one girl feeling “burdened by a prejudice which was always present even if not always overt.”19 In 1969, the school marching band faced controversy for their choosing to play “Dixie” at school football games, which resulted in the song being removed from their musical selections.20 The Kappa Alpha fraternity also received backlash in the Flat Hat for dressing up in confederate uniforms as a part of their annual spring parade, however, the tradition would carry on for another decade.21

Today

Despite the process of integration having begun in 1967 for African American undergraduate women at William & Mary, racial reconciliation continues today. Alumna Mallory Walker 2017 mentioned that her time at William & Mary included various challenges due to her race and the lack of equal representation and sociopolitical awareness at the university.
She stated that one of the primary instigators of those challenges was President Taylor Reveley, who was “incredibly problematic” during his time at William & Mary. Walker particularly referenced an incident in which President Reveley, a white man, stated, “I have color too,” while speaking to students organizing a Black Lives Matter conference at the university. Walker states that there were various issues of racism at William & Mary throughout her years at the university, but never felt as though the administration truly acted against it.22

Racial integration and equality at William & Mary is still an issue for staff members. One African American woman who worked as a William & Mary housekeeper connected her experience at the university to its history of slavery. She stated, “To this day there is still a form of slavery. I was not allowed to attend here so I haven’t come very far…but I am allowed to clean here.” She elaborated on the high proportion of African Americans among the housekeeping staff and the limited opportunities for advancement available to them. The staff member emphasized that they were assigned unfairly high amounts of work while receiving disproportionately low salaries. Many of her white colleagues chose to leave the university in search of other employment opportunities, but the majority of African American staff members had no choice but to accept their circumstances. She states “that’s still a form of slavery.”23

Additionally, recent student protests at William & Mary have shed light on the fact that the university continues to purchase its furniture from Virginia Correctional Enterprises, which uses the labor of incarcerated people paid between $0.55 and $0.80 per hour.24 As student protesters have argued, this labor is a form of modern day slavery, as it benefits from mass incarceration which disproportionately targets and exploits people of color.25 Therefore, the furniture that fills William & Mary dorms and classrooms are yet another instance of the university perpetuating the exploitation of African Americans. In this manner, William & Mary still depends on the exploitative labor of African American women. The university continues to unfairly benefit from their labor and fails to grant them the recognition they deserve.

Conclusion

African American women have contributed to William & Mary since its founding in 1693, and have been exploited to make the university’s existence and growth possible. African American women were enslaved by not only the university, but also its faculty and students. When slavery was eventually abolished, African American women became paid staff members at the university. Despite being paid, these women were in jobs with unlivable wages, poor working conditions, and few opportunities for continued advancement. Despite these women being subjected to a variety of Jim Crow era policies and incidents that led to an atmosphere of intimidation, these women remained integral to the William & Mary community and the functioning of the university. Since African American women were eventually accepted as students and faculty, they have prospered in an academic community stacked against their success. Today, African American women at William & Mary continue to greatly contribute to the university, often challenging the inequalities that remain throughout the institution.

Despite the information currently available on African American women at William & Mary, large gaps remain. The contributions of African American women in their 327 years at William & Mary must not be overlookedas an academic community, it is our responsibility to bring their contributions to light and fully explore their long history at the university. In addition, the university must continue to take progressive steps to reconcile its dark history and commit to building an institution that fundamentally values racial equality.

 

Endnotes

1 Meyers, Terry L. “A First Look at the Worst: Slavery and Race Relations at the College of 

William and Mary.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 16, no. 4 (2008). https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1055&context=wmborj.

2 The Lemon Project. “The Lemon Project: A Journey of Reconciliation: Report of the First Eight 

Years,” February 2019. https://www.wm.edu/sites/lemonproject/_documents/the-lemon-project-report.pdf.

3 Meyers, Terry L. “A First Look at the Worst: Slavery and Race Relations at the College of 

William and Mary.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 16, no. 4 (2008). 

4 Meyers, Terry L. “A First Look at the Worst: Slavery and Race Relations at the College of 

William and Mary.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 16, no. 4 (2008). 

5 Meyers, Terry L. “ Thinking About Slavery at the College of William and Mary.” William & 

Mary Bill of Rights Journal21, no. 4 (2013). https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1659&context=wmborj.

6 The Lemon Project. “The Lemon Project: A Journey of Reconciliation: Report of the First Eight 

Years,” February 2019. https://www.wm.edu/sites/lemonproject/_documents/the-lemon-project-report.pdf.

7 The Lemon Project. “The Lemon Project: A Journey of Reconciliation: Report of the First Eight 

Years,” February 2019. 

8 The Lemon Project. “The Lemon Project: A Journey of Reconciliation: Report of the First Eight 

Years,” February 2019. 

9 The Lemon Project. “The Lemon Project: A Journey of Reconciliation: Report of the First Eight 

Years,” February 2019. 

10 The Lemon Project. “African Americans and William & Mary: A Historical Timeline.” 

William & Mary. https://www.wm.edu/sites/lemonproject/researchandresources/historicaltimeline/index.php.

11 Meyers, Terry L. “A First Look at the Worst: Slavery and Race Relations at the College of 

William and Mary.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 16, no. 4 (2008). 

12 Bloom, Lois. “Integrating the College of William and Mary.” For The Lemon Project: A 

Journey of Reconciliation, September 10, 2014. https://digitalarchive.wm.edu/bitstream/handle/10288/21125/UA82_20150602_IntegratingWMBloom_Redacted.pdf?sequence=1.

13 Bloom, Lois. “Integrating the College of William and Mary.” For The Lemon Project: A 

Journey of Reconciliation, September 10, 2014. 

14 Janet Brown Strafer, Karen Ely, & Lynn Briley, W&M Class of 1971.” Special Collections 

Research Center: Oral Histories. William & Mary Libraries, March 19, 2016. https://oh.libraries.wm.edu/collection/living-the-legacy/item/janet-brown-strafer-karen-ely-&-lynn-briley-w&m-class-of-1971-0.

15 “Janet Brown Strafer, Karen Ely, & Lynn Briley, W&M Class of 1971.” Special Collections 

Research Center: Oral Histories. William & Mary Libraries, March 19, 2016. 

16 Bloom, Lois. “Integrating the College of William and Mary.” For The Lemon Project: A 

Journey of Reconciliation, September 10, 2014. 

17 “Janet Brown Strafer, Karen Ely, & Lynn Briley, W&M Class of 1971.” Special Collections 

Research Center: Oral Histories. William & Mary Libraries, March 19, 2016. 

18  “Janet Brown Strafer, Karen Ely, & Lynn Briley, W&M Class of 1971.” Special Collections 

Research Center: Oral Histories. William & Mary Libraries, March 19, 2016. 

19 Bloom, Lois. “Integrating the College of William and Mary.” For The Lemon Project: A 

Journey of Reconciliation, September 10, 2014. 

20 Bloom, Lois. “Integrating the College of William and Mary.” For The Lemon Project: A 

Journey of Reconciliation, September 10, 2014. 

21 Bloom, Lois. “Integrating the College of William and Mary.” For The Lemon Project: A 

Journey of Reconciliation, September 10, 2014. 

22 Mallory Walker, W&M Class of 2017. Special Collections Research Center, April 25, 2018. 

https://oh.libraries.wm.edu/collection/living-the-legacy/item/mallory-walker-w&m-class-of-2017

23 “Williamsburg Documentary Project.” The W&M Digital Archive,  

https://digitalarchive.wm.edu/handle/10288/453.

24 Nutter, Caroline. “College Bound to Virginia Correctional Enterprises Contract.” Flat Hat 

News. The College of William and Mary, March 27, 2018. http://flathatnews.com/2018/03/27/college-bound-to-virginia-correctional-enterprises-contract/.

25 Smith, Sarah. “[Hunger] Striking against VCE: Student Withdraws from College as Groups 

Question Conduct Process.” Flat Hat News. College of William and Mary, November 6, 2018. http://flathatnews.com/2018/11/06/hunger-striking-against-vce-student-withdraws-from-college-as-groups-question-conduct-process/.

Categories
Uncategorized

Op-Ed: Breaking the Glass Ceiling

In 2016, the New York Times told Americans that there was an 85% chance they were about to have their first woman president.[i] It was a time of high hopes – and some complacency. After the struggle for the vote and the feminist waves of the twentieth century, the natural progression seemed to show that there would finally be a First Gentleman. Yet that election and the following years showed that change is not easy to come by and is by no means guaranteed. It was discouraging to see a highly qualified woman overlooked for a less qualified man. Although that particular glass ceiling was not cracked, in 2019, the country is entering an era of unprecedented female leadership. The House of Representatives has a record-breaking number of women – and one of them is the Speaker.[ii] And while there isn’t a woman holding the title of president on the national level, the College of William & Mary will soon inaugurate its first woman president: Katherine Rowe.

For students at the College, some of whom remember being on campus for the election of 2016, this is a promising step towards the inclusive society that students have been striving for. The inauguration of President Rowe is an example of a change that cultivates new ideas and upsets the normative expectations of what society, and leadership, should look like. As President Rowe herself said, this change in the College’s leadership is a time to reflect on old traditions and values and decide on what to bring into the future.[iii] Upsetting the status quo of male leadership allows for uncomfortable, yet necessary growth in curiosity, learning, and acceptance within the William and Mary community.

It is empowering for young women everywhere, but especially at the College itself to see a woman as the face of William and Mary. President Rowe represents the College to the world, highlights William and Mary’s strengths, and is responsible for managing its flaws to create a better institutional future. Inaugurating President Rowe at this time is a positive change in the dynamic of women in leadership positions and a sign of progress on campus at the highest administrative levels. While William & Mary inaugurates President Rowe, it also celebrates the hundredth anniversary of women attending the College. The first twenty-four female students were not exactly welcomed on campus in 1918, but quickly became part of the intellectual fabric of William and Mary.[iv] Today, women are 58% of the William & Mary student body[v] and attend college at higher rates than men on a national scale[vi] – a stark change from what came before.

Although American society has come a long way since the breakthrough of women in higher education, there are still residual influences from traditional gender roles that make it difficult for women to break the glass ceiling. In the early 1900s, women were typically expected to become housekeepers who cared for the family unit and by cooking dinner, doing housework and taking care of the children. While women ruled the sphere of the home, men were dominant over the outside world, the primary actors in the political and business worlds. When they entered the workforce, women generally held jobs such as nursing, teaching, and secretarial work – those deemed appropriate for the naturally caring and gentle feminine mind. Even today, those female-dominated fields and others garner less pay than similar male-dominated fields for both men and women alike.[vii] However, with the beginning of WWI and WW2, women became a huge component of the military industrial complex through manufacturing work while men went off to war. As women were adopted into the workforce, there was hesitation as women were considered inferior to men, unable to perform the same tasks. There continue to be struggles to reconcile society’s concept of femininity in the traditionally male workplace. Gender roles stereotype women as physically and intellectually inferior to men, creating obstacles for women in leadership roles when they do not fit the normative expectations for their gender.

Female leadership often faces resistance because it clashes with the behavior prescribed by traditional gender roles. Strong leadership is characterized by quick decision making and ambition. When women try to adopt a leadership stance, their actions, while effective at accomplishing tasks, are perceived as a manifestation of aggression or abrasiveness.[viii] At the same time, men are rewarded for brusque leadership and are expected to seek more power. In general, ambitious women are considered selfish, while ambitious men are celebrated. Likability is a large factor in promotions, in addition to competency, so women with a strong management style can find themselves left behind in the hierarchy of power. Women’s negatively perceived qualities often lead to exclusion from leadership positions and doubt surrounding their professional judgement. However, when women opt to exercise soft power to exert control, the extent of their abilities is often overlooked. Soft power includes dialogues, mediation, and diplomacy – non-aggressive paths to achieving goals that better match the behavior society expects from women.[ix] Since the effect of these methods is difficult to quantify, female leaders who utilize soft power may not be criticized as unlikeable, but instead as weak and ineffective. These struggles make it difficult for women to reach positions of power such as in politics and business.

The women who do succeed in breaking the glass ceiling, like the women making up a record-breaking House of Representatives class of 2019 which includes Elaine Luria, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Kamala Harris, have overcome many societal obstacles put in place because of their gender. To see them, as well as President Rowe, is to see the enormous progress that the country, as well as the College of William and Mary, has made in acknowledging the capabilities and strength of a diverse array of women. Yet it is essential that no one should forget the lessons of the election of 2016 and how far America needs to go. In this time of government shutdowns, the gender and racial wage gap, and lack of gender diversity at top executive levels, it is encouraging to see such a visible example of what heights of power women can reach – a hint at a brighter future.

[i] Katz, Josh. “Who Will Be President?” The New York Times, 8 Nov. 2016, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html.

[ii] Herman, Elizabeth D. and Sloman, Celeste. “Redefining Representation: The Women of the 116th Congress.” The New York Times, 14 Jan. 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/01/14/us/politics/women-of-the-116th-congress.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage.

[iii] Rowe, Katherine. Personal interview. 13 Jan. 2019.

[iv] “100 Years of Coeducation at W&M.” William and Mary, 2018, www.wm.edu/news/stories/2018/100-years-of-coeducation-at-wm.php.

[v] “College of William and Mary.” US News, 2018, https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/william-and-mary-3705.

[vi] Semuels, Alana. “Poor Girls are Leaving their Brothers Behind.” The Atlantic, 27 Nov. 2017, https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/11/gender-education-gap/546677/.

[vii] Macpherson, David A., and Barry T. Hirsch. “Wages and Gender Composition: Why Do Women’s Jobs Pay Less?” Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 13, no. 3, 1995, pp. 426–471. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/2535151.

[viii] Paquette, Danielle. “Why ambitious men are celebrated and ambitious women are criticized.” Washington Post, 3 Nov. 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/03/why-ambitious-men-are-celebrated-and-ambitious-women-are-criticized/?utm_term=.cf18dc8c2018.

[ix] Nayar, Vineet. “Women and Soft Power in Business.” Harvard Business Review, 19 Jan. 2011, https://hbr.org/2011/01/women-and-soft-power-in-business.

Categories
Uncategorized

Gratitude

We did a few mindfulness exercises this weekend, different ways to calm your body and mind and observe the world around you. My favorite exercise was one that required us to look at the world through the lens of gratitude. It seemed so simple – all we had to do was write five things we were thankful for from that day (or just in general, if you couldn’t think of five things) on an index card. I spend a lot of time thinking about how I can improve this or that part of my life, so taking time to actively consider all the parts of my day that I appreciated allowed me to think of the flip side of that – all that was good and wonderful. Taking just a moment to think over these things was enough to make that day seem even better – and on days of my life that I haven’t had the best day, spending a moment in gratitude seems like the best way to put it all in perspective. One of my New Year’s Resolutions this year was to write in my journal every day. I decided to add to that after that exercise – each day, I would also write something I was grateful for.

Categories
Uncategorized

Oral Histories

When I took Apartheid: Then and Now last year for my COLL 100, we watched many documentaries with people who had lived through apartheid, suffered from its effects, and agitated against it. The fact that we could learn directly from them what it was like to live in that time was amazing to me. Perhaps their stories were filtered through their own experiences and their own imperfect memory, but that made them more authentic (although some criticize oral histories because of these flaws). This weekend was all about oral history, since the whole point of our project was that we were interviewing the Legacy 3 to discover more about the academic, residential, and social spaces they experienced. The chance to speak with them about their time here personally was amazing – they were all very sweet, accommodating, and personable. Rather than being vague historical figures, we were able to interact with them as the people they are, and discover that they all know how to tell a good story and have great laughs. Ari Weinberg, one of the grad students we worked with this weekend, said that she was interested in the history of memory. I liked that phrase – “the history of memory.” What we were doing by transcribing their words was writing a history of the College of William & Mary made up of their memories.

Categories
Uncategorized

The History of Colonial Williamsburg

The funny thing about CW is that it’s always there, on the periphery of the College, and yet I don’t think that most of us usually think too much about it. Last year, I lived in Taliaferro Hall, o the very outer limits of campus, and I still only went into it three or four times. Whenever my family came down, we walked down DoG street, catching up. My little sister would gawk at the sheep and beg to go on a horse-drawn carriage. For some reason, I assumed it had always been there. I had no idea that CW, Merchant’s Square, and all of Williamsburg had undergone a “Restoration” in the 1930s until this Branch Out weekend, which I spent researching the social spaces of the Legacy 3 – otherwise known as Janet Brown Strafer, Karen Ely, and Lynn Briley, the first African-American residential students at William & Mary. Unlike the current student population, they spent lots of time in CW, studying on the benches hidden away in the Governor’s palace maze, watching all the tourists (CW was a premier vacation destination back in the day), and seeing the Williamsburg Visitor Center orientation video so many times that they could quote the dialogue (Williamsburg: the Story of a Patriot is actually the longest-running film in history, shown since 1957). Their stories made me think that maybe I should venture further down the street than I usually do, seeking out the quiet places by the reconstructed Governor’s palace or the fields which have been cleared of houses and business apocryphal to the colonial period.

Categories
Uncategorized

Mindfulness

One of the best parts of last weekend, in my opinion, was learning about different mindfulness exercises. To be honest, I had never really considered trying mindfulness exercises before I went on this trip simply because I felt that when I got too stressed I could just take a nap or listen to music or something. Either that or I would just continue to push through it. I had never really taken the time to learn anything else about de-stressing, so learning mindfulness exercises like the breathing exercise with the beads as well as the gratitude one was actually really fun and interesting for me and now those are things I actually want to incorporate into my schedule. With the upcoming Culture Night season for WM FASA (Filipino American Student Association), it’s actually a great time for me to learn exercises like these so I can not only help myself but also other members or friends that may become overwhelmed by either rehearsals or their academics.

— Angela Tiangco

Categories
Uncategorized

Lemon Project Day Two: Interview with Legacy 3

We spent our second day at the Lemon Project meeting and interviewing the Legacy 3. This was an experience I’ll never forget. The women were genuine and hilarious, and the stories they told transported me in back in time while still remaining incredibly relevant to today. We learned about their struggles as freshman trying to figure out how to navigate academic and social lives, as well as their struggles with strict (and outdated– even at the time) regulations for female students. They spoke more about these than their struggles as African American students, but their self-awareness was apparent. They used this aspect of their life here as motivation and a source of strength to do well in their classes and graduate. I was blown away by the women’s strength and grace, and so excited to start on our part of the project.

My group  bonded today while working on the project, mostly over a long, cold walk over to Colonial Williamsburg to take photographs of the Bruton Parish graveyard where Karen spent time studying. Spending more time with my group as well as the entire Lemon Project group (grad students and all) inspired me and made me realize how lucky I was to meet and work with these women. My time spent with them and the Legacy 3’s emphasis on the prestige of their William & Mary degrees also renewed my gratitude for the ability to learn from the professors and other students here. As I said earlier, I will never forget my experience interviewing the Legacy 3, and I will be forever inspired by their strength and determination (no matter how much they insist they were just like us).

Categories
Uncategorized

Lemon Project 2018: Day 3

The last day of the Branch Out Alternative Break/Collaboration with the Lemon Project was a productive and yet another meaningful day. It began with our participation in Moral Mondays which was a rewarding and humbling experience as we got to help out as activists. Because it was Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday we honored Dr. King by participating in the Moral Monday surrounding establishing peace over cruelty from policemen, calling for positive race relations, being treated fairly based off socieconmic status and various other causes. Participating in moral monday helped launch our discussion into being an active citizen and we were able to reevaulate our citizenship continuum and how we can stimulate its growth in our busy lives. This conversation really opened up how we see ourselves as citizens doing active community service while evaluating our passions and how we can channel our passions into our actions and be more active citizens. Then as a team we collaborated on finishing the digital archive for this year’s Lemon Project project. The evening was finalized by the celebration of our accomplishment by reaffirming our thoughts about our team members in a genuinely sweet way. The trip overall was very impactful to me as it helped me realize my decreased active citizenship and reignited my passion to continue it in my daily life. Working with the lovely ladies who were in charge of running the Lemon Project as well as the participants who were willing to come back to campus early to work on the project was really great as I got to learn so much from all of them and about their passions and how they channle it into their everyday life. I realize that this blog may be somewhat rushed but I truly cherish my time on the Lemon Project this year and cannot wait until I have an opportunity to work with it again.

Categories
Uncategorized

The Legacy 3

Getting to meet the Legacy 3 this past Sunday was an incredible experience that I was lucky to have. I found that being able to hear their stories about their time on campus was just so interesting and amazing because I could picture the setting of their stories. I thought it was just really cool to learn about what the College was like around 50 years ago and how it has changed, like when dorms became co-ed and when the campus expanded and departments changed buildings. I just found that their stories provided new meanings and layers to these places around campus that I’ve grown so familiar with in my time here. In my opinion, the best part of the stories was the way in which they were told by the women. They made sure to emphasize how much their college experience paralleled those of their peers as well as today’s students. Their freshman move in day was just like ours today where we’re incredibly nervous about having to leave our families and everything we’ve known, and then we’re thrust into this completely new community where we’ll meet people that have never been like other people we know. They just made their presence on campus seem so minimal, which is unlike the way we perceive it today. And I think having that shared experience helped me be able to relate to them more and see them for what they were: just a group of regular college students.

— Angela

Categories
Uncategorized

Final Reflection

A few days after working with the Lemon Project and Branch Out, I find myself reflecting on the things I want to take with me from this weekend. One thing I valued far more than I expected to was the emphasis on mindfulness and self-care throughout the alternative break. While mindfulness and self-reflection are skills that I have been working on the past year, this weekend really emphasized the restorative power they can have in my everyday life. I fully plan on applying some of the exercises we practiced this semester to try to keep myself collected and grounded. Aside from the meditation, this weekend has instilled in me a newfound sense of what it means to serve and to be an activist. The experiences we had this weekend (meeting the Legacy 3, participating in moral Mondays) renewed my enthusiasm for community involvement and left me with a sense of pride in my college that I have not felt before. I am truly thankful to Branch Out and the Lemon Project for providing me with this incredible opportunity to learn and to serve, and I hope to carry the lessons I learned with me to create more positive and meaningful change.